🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to protect females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both within the country and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in other member states